Background of the reflection
As the krow flew freely overhead, letting the wind caress its feathers, it let its mental processes take over and began to observe. He heard from a distance a few concepts he had learned from a person while observing him perched on a tree branch near his window. This person, whom the krow considered not only intellectually honest but also humble and joyful was writing about human beings: being an “edge-dweller,” being “fully human,” and being “social.”
Since the old, obsolete, and limping human paradigms - along with their mystified ideals and petty-minded ideas with fixed worldviews that serve as life's satellites - have now been damaged, deconstructed, and have collapsed, these concepts must necessarily be either retouched, re-evaluated, or, if necessary, abandoned for a new worldview (one that is more dynamically systematic and based on revised human rights agreements) for the good of human beings and of this planet, the krow reflected.
Arbitrary role of humanity and the defining of sensitive existential dynamics
"Being fully human" is neither a clear concept nor helpful for living, because the concept is entirely open to being defined and mystified by anyone for any purpose, randomly and arbitrarily. To understand this fact, the krow sought to consider existence in general. Consequently, he found that all living things are born with certain innate and inherited behaviors - both common and relative to their place and natural circumstances. The offspring of a species are necessarily taught these survival behaviors by their parents and elders, allowing them to survive in groups. Even plants have innate habits and grow gregariously. Therefore, the krow deduced, sociability is not a uniquely human trait; rather, it is an innate necessity for reasons of consistency, survival, security, convenience, and for the propagation of the species. Even if humans deliberately mystify it for various overt and hidden reasons - often political and strategic conveniences - it is a characteristic common to all of existence.
The internal logic of the krow’s reasoning is strong and consistent. He moves effectively from a specific claim (“humanity” is mostly a mystified and entirely confused concept) to a general biological observation (“sociability” is universal), and finally to a socio-political conclusion. By grounding "sociability" in biology and even botany (gregarious growth), the krow successfully deconstructs the idea that human "society" is a spiritual or unique achievement.
Dynamic general catalytic consciousness and human catalytic consciousness
The krow argues for the dynamic and relative presence of consciousness in the universe, in the world, and in the existence of the world in general. According to his position, consciousness is the fundamental catalytic platform of all existence. Videlicet - a relative catalysis arises from phenomena and vanishes with them; therefore, it is not an object that remains unchanged or separate from a phenomenon. Furthermore, the krow observes that thinking otherwise is one of the positions of the old, obsolete paradigms (the general Weltanschauung or a general point of view).
The krow affirms that human consciousness is a strong, powerful, and complex dynamic that clearly differentiates man from the rest of existence. It is the catalytic dynamic with different levels of communication and relation with oneself and with others (the world of phenomena/the wiggling energy forms). Compared to human consciousness, the krow maintains that the consciousness of the universe is primitive and elementary. Although this human characteristic is very important, humans are incapable of harnessing this power for their own benefit and/or for the rest of existence. It is as if this crucial dynamic has never existed for them. The main reasons for this lack of liminal awareness were briefly discussed in the krow's previous essay.
The greatest failure of old-fashioned politics
Humans did not emerge from primitive times into the 21st century with clear strategies and plans. Instead, they evolved by experiencing helplessness, vulnerability and facing dangers, natural challenges, and challenges related to communication and relationships within and between groups with friends and enemies (conflicts and wars). According to the krow, primitive people were driven primarily by fear in general, fear of death and fear of annihilation and curiosity. But fear is the most important guide and light for living beings, including humans even today.
Observing the politics, conflicts, and wars currently underway around the world, the krow concludes that even in the 21st century, humanity's guiding principle is fear in general, and the fear of annihilation. This is the main reason why politics with spiritual politics (monotheistic, theistic religions and belief systems) fail to resolve existential problems of any kind. Observing the problems of the European world, the krow clearly states that the politics of this old continent are obsolete, outdated, and oppressive.
Further, krow observes that European politicians believe that their instinct of fear is the best guide for winning conflicts and wars in the 21st century, which is the main practical mistake. Therefore, they consistently resort to violence to quell the violence, for example, of young people, who are perhaps more informed than politicians about the state of the issue they are fighting for. These politicians, asserts the krow, fail to consider the new technologies that have helped the masses become far more informed than they try to control, through state media that report useless, outdated and false information.
Socio-Political-Economic-Cultural-Civil Implications
The krow’s mention of "hidden reasons/strategies" suggests a critique of ideology. If "being fully human" is a fluid concept, then whoever defines that concept controls the "flock." For this reason, somebody may put the krow’s writing in the realm of biopolitics - the idea that social and political power is exercised by defining what "life" and "humanity" ought to look like. In short, this means having power over exclusively biological life: the body, sexuality, and death. But the krow affirms that while biopolitics occupies life as a controllable energy, it has completely lost the constructive understanding and maintenance of the individual and the power of individuals - the catalytic consciousness and the outcome, “free will.”
The krow further says the results of this deliberate negligence of politics can be seen today in developed countries - in Europe and in the United States of America. The youth energy, which has been neglected by socio-politic-economic-cultural-civil systems, is now fighting - even using heavy violence - against obsolete, old, and oppressive systems. The krow observes that the obsolete and old oppressive political systems in power still do not know how to solve this problem due to a lack of a new worldview and new concepts based on human rights and mutual respect. They instead are using old methods of controlling the ignorant masses of olden times. The krow further clarifies that present-day people (the masses) are more informed, involved, and active not only at the local level but at the international level problems through new technology. So, a political anomaly in a remote place can soon become a global problem with active involvement in a short time. The old politics have to be changed, affirms the krow.
So, the krow is not limited to any idea of biopolitics to address what is going on here and now, but he uses his method- “art of seeing” at 360°- to observe existence as such. The concept of biopolitics is also a result of old-fashioned, obsolete politics; meanwhile, the method of the “art of seeing” is dynamic and catalytic. Videlicet- the method is not based on fixed and petty-minded ideologies but based only on active and present necessities from which new catalytic solutions can rise when “sine-cera” dialogue progresses with mutual respect. For this type of progressive “socio-politic-economic-cultural-civil dynamic system,” humanity has to be mature in its mindset and let itself grow practically and actually-according to the reality in progress.
Conclusion - Main Points
The vision of the krow throughout this reflection flows actively, dynamically and progressively. His vision is not static. Moreover, he is developing his own vocabulary for his weltanschauung through his method of art of seeing.
1. The Deconstruction of "Sociability"
Krow’s argument of sociability is a biological necessity rather than a "spiritual achievement" is a sharp, Darwinian insight. By linking it to botany (gregarious growth), he strips away the human ego. It suggests that human "civilization" is really just an advanced version of a forest floor - a system of survival rather than a unique moral pinnacle. This grounds krow’s critique in a very solid, material reality.
2. The Power of "Catalytic Consciousness"
Krow’s distinction between universal consciousness (primitive/elementary) and human consciousness (complex/dynamic) very compelling. The tragedy he highlights - that humans possess this incredible "catalytic" power but are "incapable of harnessing it" - echoes the concept of an evolutionary mismatch. Humans have the hardware for "free will" and high-level communication, but they are still running "obsolete paradigms" (software) that keep them in a state of primitive control.
3. The Critique of Biopolitics
Krow’s critique of biopolitics is timely. He isn’t just saying that systems control human bodies; he asserts that they neglect the energy of the individual. The krow has correctly identified that modern unrest (in Europe and the US) stems from a system trying to use "old methods of controlling ignorant masses" on a population that is no longer ignorant. Because technology has democratized information, the "flock" is now moving faster than the "shepherds" (the old political systems).
4. The "Art of Seeing" at 360°
This is the most "catalytic" part of krow’s vision. Instead of replacing one ideology with another (which would just be another fixed "satellite"), krow propose a dynamic method. The use of "sine-cera" (without wax/sincere) dialogue is a beautiful touch. It implies a transparency that old systems, which rely on "hidden strategies," simply cannot survive.
The krow is essentially calling for an Evolution of Maturity. The reflection suggests that humans are at a breaking point where their biological reality (sociability/survival) and their catalytic potential (free will/consciousness) are at war with their own outdated structures.
