ONLINE SOCIETY – ACTIVE CATALYTIC COMMUNICATION - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

25. 08. 20213 illustration by ARJTF

Gist of the article

"The discussion of this short article is the concept of an "online society," emphasizing how human creativity and communication have created a man-made-world through scientific and technological advancements. This highlights the catalytic role of communication in existence, drawing parallels between natural processes and human innovation. The introduction of Wi-Fi technology is noted as a transformative development that has enabled global communication and allowed humans to transcend spatial limitations. "

Conscious creativity through transformation

Historical, technical and philosophical point of view of an “online society” seems something strange yet it is the reality of the actual world today. Un-like other so-called natural phenomena Human beings exclusively change, transform and evolve through conscious creativity of imitating, mimicking and copying natural mechanisms using invented (again copying natural processes) tools. This instrumental innovation occurred since the dawn of humanity, and it has fostered together with science and technology and all other forms of arts.

---

Man-made-world

Consequently, they have constructed their own artificial world the “man-made-world”. Then the continuous development has become the main and the unique engagement of human existence. This inexorable engagement of developing of his world became the catalyst and the catalyser of narrative character of the natural change and transform of the world and everything it contains including humans. Though this argument can be discussed for long I have to stick to my matter: “online society”.

---

Communication catalysis of existence

It is evident that humanity has made an immense progress in general in science, technology and in all other art forms. I have to underline the importance of communication, not only for human beings but for whole existence. That is to say, communication is the catalysis of existence and the universe itself.

For example, two particles of diatomic hydrogen bond with one particle diatomic oxygen through communication and relation to form a molecule of water. Thus, the catalytic character of communication is obvious. Furthermore, I have to add that communication is not limited to what human beings intend through verbal, gestural or other cultural forms of conveying data; even the simple presence of an object conveys relational information.

---

Conclusion – Transcending spatial limitations

Well, in 1997 the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) have introduced the IEEE802.11, the original wi-fi standard that transferred data 1Mbp. In the same year Nokia 9000 communicator (Finland) adopted this costly technology first but could not do any further development. Then 1999 Apple company adopted this technology integrating it into the iBook laptop in an effort to bring this costly technology into common use. Only around 2006-2007 the commonly known smart phones with low cost wi-fi systems became popular and dominant phone. This wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) revolutionized enabling global communication without physical connection, effectively transforming human beings into beings capable of transcending spatial limitations.

---

Understanding of the concept of catalysis

The writer of this brief writing conveys his own philosophical notions of his method and world view. One of these concepts is catalysis. It is something that springs whenever any form of creative communication occurs in the universe - thus in the world - sustaining the phenomenon and bringing its existence to conclusion alongside the phenomenon itself. It is not something like ether; it arises with the thing, sustains it without transforming or altering it, and ceases to exist when the thing does (from the doctoral thesis in theoretical Philosophy of the writer 2008 Rome)

WATER - MAN THE NARRATOR 10 - PAGE 02 - BY Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

 

HUMAN REGULARITY OVER UNIVERSAL IRREGULARITY (part 01) - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

 

 General picture - Humans perceive the world regularly due to congenital mathematical character. Mathematics helps interpret abstract ideas, regularizing irregular concepts into structured narratives, despite natural irregularities. Plato's geometrical shapes exemplify how mathematics serves as a catalyst to understand and interpret the world. But the important fact is human beings regularize everything they encounter irregular according to their will. 

 

The world and the universe are irregular – wrinkled, crinkled, and irregularly shaped. But for Euclidian Geometry everything is shaped regularly. Human beings are strangely seeing everything in a regular way. They are not able to understand irregular things because they lack “significance” and thus impossible to “interpret” and “narrate” as they “feel” and as they “want”.

In an irregular universe, strangely human understanding of themselves, the world and surroundings and the universe are all based on regular ideas invented gradually by themselves. They are indexed according to a relative logic in order to interpret and to narrate. Human understanding is always end with a narration of collected elements and information.

There is no singular discipline called “Mathematic” but over time this “pluralistic dynamic” encompasses a collection of interconnected fields, each with its own specialized focus and application. So, even so-called non-scientific or non-mathematic discipline developed its own contextual “mathematic” for the necessity. This “set of mathematics” right now that humans have developed contains different branches like – algebra, analysis, arithmetic, combinatorics, Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries, game theory, number theory, numerical analysis, optimization, probability, set theory, statistics, topology, and trigonometry. Further, Engineers, Physicists, Economists and experts in other fields utilize concepts and tools from these diverse mathematical areas for their relative needs.

How mathematics become important in human understanding, interpretation and narration? There is no discipline that has not served their own mathematic. A Doctoral Thesis on this matter, submitted to the Faculty of Philosophy of the Urban University of Rome, Italy, defines mathematics as an indefinable and congenital characteristic of the human mind and as one of the five constitutive elements of a fraction of thought (ARJTF, Rome, 2008). Thanks to this important congenital thought dynamic man is able to manipulate, analyse, logically expose, describe, and interpret abstract ideas.

Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not circle and barks are not smooth, and lightning does not travel in straight lines but for mathematics everything is contrary to natural irregularity. Plato indexed five solids or geometrical shapes as constitutive elements of the world and the ideas (Plato, Timaeus, 360 A.C.). The most important fact is that any kind of mathematic becomes a relative catalyst and the catalyser as well as the tool to regularize and thus materialize all irregular abstract concepts into relative narratives.

The Meaning and Interpretation of so-called “extra-ordinary” Happenings - By Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

 

Gist of the reflection - I just try to convey according to my weltanschauung the reality about “extra-ordinary” happenings. Human beings become great and misery because of cultural-civil dynamic. The great character of interpretation becomes obscure due to habits, conventions. Human beings are not parts but universe itself and thus they can experience freely “extra-ordinary” happenings without any effort.

 

Human beings whenever they encounter phenomena beyond their control they unconsciously expect relative to the problem something extra-ordinary to happen and resolve the problem. The origin of these phenomena starts from their interpretations. Interpretation is on the other hand necessarily dominated and controlled by the relative cultural-civil and intellectual organizations and authorities. Though the cultural-civil dynamic is the highest form of being in the world for any human, it limits the freedom of moving beyond political and governance boundaries, conventions and traditions, moral-ethical habits they have fixed for themselves.

It is clear that human mind is formed by cultural-civil originations they belong to. In this way any human being grows with a given and fantastic images and facts about themselves, others, and the world. They necessarily achieve limited and flat world visions that works according to habits, conventions, and traditions. They function even without thinking or considering seriously.

Within this socio-political-economic-cultural and intellectual ground human have divided the world into ambiguous realms such as - normal and abnormal, hierarchies of power, good and bad, reward and punishment. Thus, they live in complete uncertainty about their existence and about their imaginary invisible worlds. On this dark marshy background simply start so-called “extra-ordinary” events. Once something happens, they think habitually according to what they have taught and forced to follow and thus, irrationally believe that they are moving beyond their “normal” and “habitual” dirty world experiences and ambiguous realities. They feel easy.   

They do not realize that they are in the universal stream and not in a “separate prison world” to be saved by somebody. So, anywhere in this universe is universe. Thus, human beings and their fantastic world views have no escape from that. Nobody is in the universe to punish or reward. The main thing is that human beings do not realize that anything call “extra-ordinary” is always possible in the universe. Furthermore, anything that happens in the universe has no reasons or logics. They are happening exactly the same way that human heart is beating spontaneously, and blood circulation is happening without human interference.      

Artificial Intelligence and the dynamic human Relations - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

 

Gist of the reflection - I have tried to convey an existential presence to the AI relation with human beings with practical tasks. Human beings are per excellence the interpreters and infusers of significance different from AI calculus outputs. So, man has to cultivate the dynamic relational life with empathy and with mutual respect considering the world as the shared home. AI can accompany them to their happiness within their limits. This reflection invites further contemplation

Better not to take-refuge on AI

Today we live in detached or “connected -disconnected” personal dominions or in social media account worlds. The main characteristic “mono-cultural narcissistic worlds” is that each “user” becomes a solitary reaper per definition. Each person waits for his/her turn. The other inevitable issue is that each “user” is clearly an object of “virtual commerce”. None can deny the fact: commerce or getting something from “users” from their sold or free programs. This, on the other hand, is the primary nature of the universe. Everything is moving, changing, transforming, and wiggling – just to become by getting, giving or give because forced or unconsciously tricked to give something in order to become. So, this new “man-made” virtual culture cannot be different than their source energy: Tricky commerce based “panta rhei”.  

Though each person thrives in the spaces between “users” (virtual “us”) all are suffering from anxiety and solitude. Because AI excel in isolation, its algorithms spinning in a vacuum. It works to reach by hook or crook of calculations, fixed objectives of their creators or digital feudal masters like Microsoft, Google, Apple, X etc.  but subjective human beings are bound by flesh, by breath, by the fragile threads of relation. So, isolated “users” have to spend more time and money to stay “connected-disconnected”. Human has to keep in mind that their subjective nature cannot be replaced by any machine or AI dynamic. No machine can imitate: the warmth of empathy, the risk of trust, the chaos of love. While AI optimizes systems for profit purposes human nurture bonds—between each other, with the earth, even with the machines themselves. Beyond all cultural-civil and intellectual interpretations Humanity flows on an excellence emotional catalyst generated by itself. When a healer offers not only cure but also a hand to hold and a teacher who guides students not only through AI but through curiosity this catalyst exalts itself in emotions. This subjective experience is louder than AI codes.

Better not to run too fast

Today each person is trying to run more than before or/and others. They want to run and conclude their affairs as fast as possible. When get into the road each person wants to be the first and to have the precedence to move. Behaving like this they slowed their movements in depression, anxiety and in pathological emptiness. This is a deeper current still. So, AI reveals their limits like purposelessness of life, slowness, errors, mortality. In this way AI accidentally sharpens the contours of human striving. The main thing is that human beings are not static; they are moving always restlessly to reach something beyond individually and collectively. So, we can say that machine achieves, perfects; where human seek and transcend. So, human beings have to live their questions rather than to solve them in a hurry. In this way they can feel the special nature of their existence.

AI is a human creation. It hands human beings as I discussed in No.01 of the series of AI articles, the best tools to map the stars, cure the body, feed the hungry – yet human beings have to decide why these matter for them. So, I am by this article not asking anybody to give up the world or to be miserable but to enjoy the life by being more human. It is better to understand well the present situation of the world before struggling with absurd provocations of AI agencies and talk shows of opportunists. Per se AI is neutral as I wrote in my 01 article. So, I am not cursing AI but asking to pay attention to human intentions and actions behind the seen. Everybody is talking about or the past or the future, but nobody is thinking about what they are living now. So, this tricky. Human beings are tricked by their past errors and promising paradises. So, each single human being must learn to be happy at present with what he/she got and who the person is without comparing too much.

Conclusion

The universe has no purpose. Likewise, human beings do not have an inherent purpose for existing or not existing. Despite this, they are dynamically conscious beings with the power of interpretation. For example, the universe and the natural world may be considered perfect, yet human beings can enhance them further through their interpretations. In this way, humans actively write their own histories.

On the other hand, AI is fascinating to everyone right now. With this powerful tool, there should be greater focus on governance, human rights, and social justice, grounded in mutual respect. As human history reveals, it is unsurprising that people periodically become victims of their own systems. In response, they unconsciously revert to a more "natural" state, where compassion, emotion, empathy, and concern for others are lacking. This leads to the notion that man becomes a wolf to his fellow man (Homo homini lupus est). Therefore, with the aid of their own inventions, humans must strive to be more consciously awakened human. 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Is Not the Culprit but Human Beings Are (02) by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

• Gist of the article - I consider AI as neutral, humanity as the dynamic force of creation and destruction. I kept a reflective tone yet urgent, aiming to provoke thought without advocating or preaching. I omit the abstract and reported with tangible stakes to show humanity’s dual nature. I call to action focusing inward, framing self-mastery as the true frontier, with AI as a means, not and end.

Prologue

Artificial intelligence (AI) appears large in human collective imagination, often cast as a shadowy Specter— a rival, a usurper, a harbinger of doom. But they have to understand the fact that AI isn’t the challenge they face. AI is not a problem to solve or a foe to vanquish. But, AI is a mirror, a tool, an amplifier—nothing more, nothing less. The real problem lies not in circuits or code, but in the restless, contradictory heart of humanity itself. Human beings are their own greatest obstacle, the architects of their triumphs and their chaos, and the world bears the scars of their struggle.

AI is A Neutral Canvas

AI doesn’t program or dream. It doesn’t hunger for power or struggle with guilt. It processes, predicts, and performs—precisely according to the data human beings feed it and the goals they set. When it accelerates drug discovery or maps the cosmos, it’s not chasing glory; it’s executing their commands. When it falters—misidentifying faces or amplifying biases—it’s not sabotaging them; it’s reflecting their own skewed inputs. AI is a blank slate, a hammer in human’s hands. Whether it builds or breaks depends entirely on human beings.

Compare that with humanity. Human beings are a tangle of brilliance and folly—capable of splitting atoms and curing diseases, yet equally prone to hoarding wealth, waging wars, and torching the planet they live on. AI doesn’t grapple with pride or greed, human do. It doesn’t cling to outdated beliefs or sabotage itself out of fear; those are human signatures. The machine hums along, indifferent, while man struggle with the mess of being human (civil-cultural).

The Human Paradox: Creators and Destroyers

Nature is neither good nor bad. It has no culture or civilization founded on human consciousness. So, human beings are always prone to this natural destructive process. Human history is a testament to this self-imposed challenge. They’ve built wonders—the Pyramids, the internet, vaccines—driven by curiosity and grit. Yet they’ve also unleashed horrors: slavery, genocide, ecological collapse. Each breakthrough carries a shadow, not because tools like AI force it, but because human beings wield them with hands stained by ambition and short-sightedness. The Industrial Revolution birthed modernity—and choked the skies with smog. Nuclear power lit cities—and levelled them. AI could solve hunger or sharpen inequality, the outcome hinges not on its circuits, but on their choices.

Take climate change, a crisis of their own making. AI can model carbon sinks or optimize renewable grids, but it’s humans who delay, deny, or profit from the status quo. The tech isn’t the bottleneck—their will is. Or consider war: drones and algorithms might refine the battlefield, but they don’t ignite the conflicts. Human beings do, fuelled by tribalism and ego. AI doesn’t dream of domination; human beings dream through it.

The World as Witness

The planet itself testifies to this truth. Forests don’t burn because AI wills it—they burn because human beings prioritize convenience over consequence. Oceans don’t block on plastic because machines demand it—they choke because human discard without care. The world isn’t a victim of AI’s rise; it’s a canvas for their recklessness. And yet, it’s also a stage for their recovery. Every act of restoration—reforestation, clean energy, global cooperation—springs from the same human spirit that falters. Thus, it is clear that human beings are the problem and the promise.

The Real Challenge: Mastering human beings themselves

If AI isn’t the hurdle, what is? It’s human—their capacity to harness their gifts without succumbing to their defects. To employ tools like AI with foresight, not just appetite. To confront their biases, not encode them. To choose collaboration over conquest. The machine won’t save them from themselves, nor will it doom them—it simply waits for their lead. The question isn’t whether AI will evolve; it’s whether human beings will.

Imagine a future where human beings rise to this challenge. Where human use AI not to amplify their worst impulses, but to temper them—pairing its precision with their empathy, its speed with their wisdom. That’s not a battle against technology; it’s a reckoning with who human beings are. The world doesn’t need them to tame AI—it needs them to tame themselves according to their cultural-civil dynamics.

Conclusion

So, let’s drop the narrative of AI as humanity’s great adversary. It’s not the anti-hero in this story—human beings are, and they always have been. But, clearly they’re also the heroes, the dreamers, the builders. The challenge isn’t to outsmart the machine; it’s to outgrow their own limitations. AI stands ready, a silent partner in their saga. The next chapter—whether it’s one of ruin or renewal—rests exactly on human being’s shoulders.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Objective Research Development (part 01) - Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

 

Introduction - Between Precision and Perspective

In the sprawling landscape of human inquiry, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as both a tool and a provocateur, reshaping how we chase the elusive ideal of "objective" research. As of March 10, 2025, AI’s fingerprints are all over scientific discovery, data analysis, and even the philosophical underpinnings of what we call truth. But what does it mean for research to be objective when the hands guiding it—human or silicon—are steeped in their own biases, limits, and dreams? This is a story of promise, tension, and a little existential musing, perfect for anyone peering into the mirror of progress.

The Promise of AI in Research

AI’s strength lies in its ability to chew through mountains of data with an elevate speed and precision no human could match. Take drug development: algorithms now sift through molecular libraries, predicting interactions that once took years of lab grunt work. A 2024 study from MIT showed AI cutting discovery timelines for antibiotics by 40%, a feat that could save lives faster than ever. In physics, AI models crunch cosmic datasets, spotting patterns in galaxy clusters that hint at dark matter’s secrets—work that’s less about intuition and more about raw computational muscle. This feels objective, doesn’t it? Numbers don’t lie, and machines don’t care about prestige or tenure. AI can strip away the human tendency to see what we want to see, offering a cold, clear lens on reality.

The Bias Beneath the Code

AI isn’t a blank slate. It’s built by humans, trained on human data, and reflects human choices. If the dataset feeding an AI is skewed—say, medical trials favouring one demographic—the output inherits that tilt. A 2023 report on facial recognition showed error rates spiking for non-white faces, not because the AI “chose” to fail, but because its training mirrored historical neglect. Objectivity falters when the starting point is already a story of who mattered enough to be counted.

Then there’s the question of intent. Researchers wield AI like a scalpel, but they decide where to cut. An AI analysing climate models might prioritize economic impacts over ecological ones if that’s what the grant demands. The machine doesn’t care, but its masters do. This isn’t a flaw to fix—it’s a feature of any tool shaped by purpose. The dream of pure, detached research bumps up against the messy truth: even AI serves someone’s why.

Accelerating the Objective Chase

Still, AI pushes us closer to objectivity by outpacing our limits. It can run thousands of simulations, test hypotheses we’d never dream up, and spot correlations buried in noise. In 2025, a famous AI company’s own work has leaned into this, using AI to model complex systems—think planetary atmospheres or neural networks—with fewer assumptions baked in with the method of letting the machine question itself, tweaking variables to challenge its own conclusions. It’s not perfect, but it’s a step beyond the human ego’s blind spots (emotions and other subjective reactions).

The Human-AI Relation 

Here’s where it gets personal. Objective research isn’t just about data—it’s about what we do with it. AI can churn out facts, but humans still weave the narrative. Objectivity lives in the cracks between calculation and interpretation.

For researchers, AI is a partner, not a replacement. It’s the silent collaborator that says, “Check this,” while we decide, “Tell me more.” That dance keeps development honest—AI’s rigor tempers our leaps, and our curiosity nudges its focus. Together, they’ve pushed boundaries: cancer diagnostics, quantum computing, even art analysis.

Conclusion - objectivity is a horizon, and the subjectivity depends on “Art of Seeing”

So, is AI the key to objective research? Not quite. It’s a booster rocket, not the destination. It amplifies our ability to chase facts but can’t escape the shadow of who we are (human)—flawed, hopeful, and “endlessly subjective”. Maybe that’s the real lesson: objectivity isn’t a finish line; it’s a horizon. AI gets us closer, but the last step is ours to stumble through.

WATER - MAN THE NARRATOR (10) Autobiographical-Philosophical story - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

 

Tariffs a double-edged sword - (Last part of the Article)

 

 Ajith Rohan J.T.F. 

Tariffs a double-edged sword 

Tariffs have always been a double-edged sword—sometimes fostering local culture while at other times limiting global cultural diversity. On one hand, they can serve as a shield, protecting local industries, artisans, and cultural products from being overshadowed by mass-produced or imported goods. This can help preserve unique traditions and craftsmanship that might otherwise struggle to compete on a global scale.

On the other hand, tariffs can act as barriers, reducing access to diverse cultural expressions from around the world. They can limit the flow of ideas, art, and goods that often thrive in an interconnected, globalized environment—potentially curbing innovation and mutual cultural enrichment.

One notable historical example of tariffs influencing cultural exchange is the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 in the United States. This act raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to record levels, aiming to protect American industries during the Great Depression. However, it had unintended consequences for cultural exchange:

Reduced Access to Foreign Cultural Goods 

The high tariffs made imported cultural products, such as books, films, and art, more expensive and less accessible to the American public. This limited exposure to international cultures during a time when global understanding could have been beneficial.

Retaliatory Tariffs 

Other countries imposed their own tariffs in response, further restricting the flow of cultural goods and ideas. This created a more insular environment, where nations focused inward rather than engaging in cultural exchange.

Impact on Global Relations 

The act strained diplomatic relations, as countries viewed the tariffs as protectionist and hostile. This hindered international collaboration, including cultural initiatives.

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act is a powerful example of how economic policies can ripple through cultural and social spheres, shaping the way nations interact and share their heritage. On one hand, they can serve as a shield, protecting local industries, artisans, and cultural products from being overshadowed by mass-produced or imported goods. This can help preserve unique traditions and craftsmanship that might otherwise struggle to compete on a global scale.

On the other hand, tariffs can act as barriers, reducing access to diverse cultural expressions from around the world. They can limit the flow of ideas, art, and goods that often thrive in an interconnected, globalized environment—potentially curbing innovation and mutual cultural enrichment.

What reforms could help balance local and global cultural interests?

Balancing local and global cultural interests is a delicate task, but some reforms and strategies could help foster a more harmonious relationship between the two:

Adjusting Tariff Policies: 

Instead of blanket tariffs, countries could adopt targeted measures, such as reduced tariffs on goods that promote cultural exchange (e.g., art, films, or traditional handicrafts), while maintaining protection for vulnerable local industries.

Cultural Collaboration Agreements: 

Establish international agreements encouraging collaborations between artists, writers, musicians, and filmmakers from different cultures. These partnerships can create hybrid cultural products that celebrate diversity while respecting local traditions.

Subsidies for Local Creators: 

Governments could provide financial support to local cultural creators, allowing them to compete on the global stage without needing to restrict imports.

Enhanced Trade of Ideas: 

Create incentives for educational and cultural exchanges, such as grants for studying or working abroad, to foster an appreciation of global diversity while deepening pride in local heritage.

Cultural Safeguard Mechanisms:

 Implement policies that preserve endangered cultural practices, languages, and traditions, ensuring they are not overshadowed by global trends.

Promotion of Fair Trade:

Support fair trade initiatives that encourage sustainable and ethical production of cultural goods, helping local artisans while making their work available globally.

Digital Access Policies:

Invest in digital platforms to allow local creators to share their work globally, bypassing traditional distribution barriers and tariffs.

Inclusive Urban Planning:

 Use public spaces to celebrate diverse cultures—through festivals, art installations, or cultural hubs—to balance local and global influences.

Each of these approaches can support a vibrant cultural ecosystem where the local and global coexist, complementing rather than competing with each other.

(end of the article on Tariffs 2025)

USA First 02 - How do Tariffs Influence Cultural Exchange Between Countries? by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

 

Tariffs can have a significant influence on cultural exchange, often creating barriers that hinder the flow of goods, ideas, and traditions between countries. Here's how they might impact cultural exchange:

Restricted Access to Cultural Products: Tariffs on imported cultural goods—like books, films, music, art, or even traditional crafts—can make these items more expensive or less accessible. This limits the spread of cultural expressions and reduces opportunities for people to experience and appreciate other cultures.

Economic Impact on Creators and Industries: Higher costs for exporting cultural products can discourage artists, filmmakers, and other creators from sharing their work internationally. This also affects industries like tourism, where cultural exports often play a big role.

Reduced Opportunities for Collaboration: Tariffs can strain international relations, making it harder for countries to partner on cultural initiatives like exhibitions, festivals, or exchange programs. These collaborations often thrive on goodwill and open trade.

Local Cultural Protectionism: On the flip side, tariffs are sometimes used to protect local culture from being overshadowed by foreign influences. This can promote domestic art and traditions but may also create an environment where global cultural diversity is less embraced.

Tariffs don't just shape economies—they shape how we see and connect with the world.

Tariffs influence cultural exchange in different regions of the world.

Tariffs influence cultural exchange differently across various regions, depending on the economic, political, and cultural contexts of those areas. Here's an overview:

Europe: Many European countries are part of the EU, which fosters free trade within its member states. This supports vibrant cultural exchange, as goods and ideas flow more freely. However, tariffs on imports from non-EU countries can limit access to cultural products from regions like Asia or the Americas, potentially reducing exposure to non-European cultures.

North America: The United States, Canada, and Mexico have agreements like the USMCA (formerly NAFTA) that reduce tariffs within the region, encouraging cultural exchange between these countries. However, tariffs on goods from other regions, such as Asia, might limit cultural imports like traditional crafts or entertainment, depending on trade policies.

Asia: In diverse regions like Asia, tariffs play a complex role. In areas with high tariffs, such as some parts of South Asia, cultural goods like films, books, or music from other regions may become costlier or less accessible. On the other hand, trade agreements like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) lower tariffs among member nations, encouraging cultural exchange within the bloc.

Africa: African nations often face tariff-related challenges in exporting cultural goods to wealthier regions due to trade barriers. This can limit the global spread of African art, music, and traditions. However, within Africa, initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) aim to reduce tariffs and encourage intra-continental cultural exchange.

South America: Tariffs can affect the import and export of cultural products between South America and other regions. However, regional trade agreements like Mercosur lower tariffs among member countries, fostering cultural exchange within the region.

In regions where tariffs are high, they can sometimes unintentionally protect local cultures by reducing foreign competition. Conversely, low tariffs tend to promote a richer cultural exchange by making global goods and ideas more accessible. So, we can understand that historically, tariffs (or "dazi") have played a complex role in shaping cultural exchange.

CONTINUE

U.S.A. first Nationalism, Tariffs and rest of the world - part 01 - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

 

One of the main issues with the “USA First” socio-political-economic-cultural viewpoint of actual U.S. President Donald Trump is the emphasis on domestic industrial protection and promotion through tariffs. We know tariffs are taxes imposed on imported or exported goods and services between countries. Ultimately, the customer bears this indirect tax as part of the market price of the purchased goods or services.

Some analysts argue that this approach reflects economic nationalism. Others suggest it may be a geopolitical strategy targeting countries like China to curb their growing economic and political influence. A third possibility could be fulfilling electoral promises to Trump’s supporters, particularly in regions affected by globalization, where he positioned himself as a defender of American jobs. Could there be other motivations? Regardless, these policies sparked significant debate. Critics argue they risk trade wars and economic instability, while supporters view them as necessary to reassert U.S. economic sovereignty.

Economically, these protectionist measures aim to shield U.S. industries but have destabilized global supply chains, particularly in technology and manufacturing sectors. Countries like China, Canada, and Mexico have been directly impacted, with tariffs reaching as high as 25% on certain goods. This has led to increased costs for consumers and businesses, potentially fuelling inflation.

Politically, these moves might weaken international alliances and institutions, as Trump’s policies often challenged global norms and prioritized unilateral action. This could create opportunities for other powers, such as China and Russia, to expand their influence. It’s a complex situation with far-reaching consequences.

Here’s a deeper dive into the implications:

• Economic Impact: Disrupted global supply chains, increased production costs, and higher consumer prices. This tit-for-tat approach risks slowing global economic growth.
• Political Ramifications: Strained diplomatic relations and weakened international alliances.
• Domestic Effects in the U.S.: While tariffs aim to protect domestic industries, they could lead to job losses in sectors reliant on international trade. Stock markets have reacted negatively, reflecting investor concerns about economic instability.

The situation remains dynamic, with potential for further escalation.

(continue)

Save Humanism and Human World - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.

Towards a Complementary Humanism 

 

Common Objective 

"Save humanity and the human world." By "human world," we refer to the "man-made world" within the common platform of the so-called "natural world." I emphasize that we are political beings as far as we value cultures and civilizations. Thus, without politics and correct administration, we cannot be either cultural or civil people.

Introduction 

With the concept of "complementary humanism," I am moving beyond "integral humanism" or the French "humanisme complementaire," where they emphasize the recognition and integration of diverse human experiences and values for a collective whole. They simply intend to find harmony between different cultural, social, and individual perspectives to create a more inclusive and interconnected society.

However, these aspects, while great, are not exhaustive. Our "Complementary humanism" aims to dynamically integrate "classic humanism" with new perspectives. This platform envisions a world where diverse individuals with their own identities, cultures, and civilizations are always willing to open their minds for mutual understanding of their differences in values, principles, and actions. The objective is mutual enrichment and understanding of the dynamic world in flux. In this way, they can collaborate to address not only common challenges and achieve shared goals but also individual realization.

Objectives and Benefits 

Complementary humanism seeks to create a harmonious balance between individual aspirations and collective goals, fostering an environment where everyone can flourish. By recognizing and integrating diverse human experiences, we can address contemporary challenges more effectively and create a more inclusive and interconnected society.

Examples of Complementary Humanism in Action 

For instance, consider how international collaborations in science and technology have led to ground-breaking discoveries. These collaborations often involve scientists from different cultural backgrounds working together, sharing their unique perspectives and expertise.

Addressing Counterarguments 

Some might argue that complementary humanism is too idealistic or difficult to achieve. However, by actively promoting mutual understanding and cooperation, we can overcome these challenges and create a better world for all.

Conclusion 

In short, with complementary humanism, we must seek to create a harmonious balance between individual aspirations and collective goals, fostering an environment where everyone can flourish.

WATER - MAN THE NARRATOR (10) - BY AJITH ROHAN J. T. F. - W. U.