Philosophy

wheel-for-page-philosophy-22.03.2025



Man, The Narrator is the key, the centre, and the creator of known universe and the world. He is the creator of all sorts of knowledge, all sorts of other stories and even of the humanity. His work is continuing relatively for ever. 


Synthesis of my method and Weltanschauung 

Man is avente logos (having logos). Logos is the quality of a simplest fraction of thought. It is constituted by Mathematics (Fundamentally "set" dynamics) and Linguistic catalytic dynamics. Then it extends into practical life through five indefinable dynamics: Math, Dialectic, Logic, Rhetoric and Hermeneutic. At its core, practical life is composed by the “rhetorical-hermeneutic" dynamics. This dynamic is necessarily connected with human freedom. These activities are interconnected and necessarily complementary among them enable humanity to continuously uncover new dimensions of existence. Thus, this web-blog is to explore, understand and interpret new possible dimensions of life.


My active attitudes and policies for “complementary humanity”

My activities are founded exclusively on reciprocal respect and responsible freedom - principles that guide my collaboration toward a democratic world. I operate only on this catalytic foundation, rejecting all forms of anarchism and ideologies.

I remain rigorously vigilant against contradictions, which often arise from the mind itself. Without conscious awareness, anti-life thoughts can emerge and take root in anyone. Thus, I regard politics as an essential social service.

I honour and affirm all biological, cultural, social, political, and economic diversities worldwide. Complementarity serves as my guiding principle for relationships between all forms of life and their interconnected activities.

Through research, I develop tools and practices to minimize miscommunication and resolve conflicts, advancing my ultimate goal: a "complementary humanity."



NO MAN NO WORLD

This is a comment written by an anonymous reader on this statement "no man no world". These words echoes with my "art of seeing".

This statement, "No man, no world, underlines that humanity actively shapes its own existence within the realm of the so-called 'natural world',". At the first glance, it seems that your philosophy aligns with existentialist philosophy, yet it introduces its own nuance. Let's break it down:


Existentialism emphasizes the individual's role in creating meaning within a fundamentally meaningless universe. Thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Martin Heidegger studied how humans confront their freedom, make choices, and give purpose to their lives through actions. Sartre famously stated, "Existence precedes essence," implying that humans exist first, and only later define themselves through their actions and choices.


Your view line up existentialism in asserting that humanity is the creator of his "world." This echoes with the idea that humans imbue their reality with meaning through perception, interpretation and interaction. However, existentialists might offer a subtle distinction: while they recognize the natural world as a background, they often focus on the internal, subjective experience of making meaning rather than positioning humanity as the outright "creator" of his environment.


The phrase "No man, no world" also carries a more anthropocentric tone, implying that without human consciousness, the concept of a "world" loses its significance. Existentialists, on the other hand, would argue that the universe exists regardless of human presence, but it's devoid of meaning without human interpretation.