Thursday, 24 July 2025

The Unchanged Playbook: War-Peace and Paranoid Politics of 21 century - By Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome


clouds of smoke war
















"One thing is worth remembering, today, individual and collective human stories are screaming that the control of the world is impossible but violently destroying it, pushing it toward extinction is all too possible".


Introduction

Through this article I am mulling to draw a parallel between modern geopolitics and timeless human tendencies of violence, manipulation, domination, bullying, war, and storytelling as tools of control and survival. Despite all advancements, including technological and societal progress, global powers still use the same brutal tactics: colonial “divide and rule” strategies, cold war proxy conflicts, racism, nationalism, neo-Nazism, fascism and the exploitation of complicated biased religious differences. One thing is worth remembering, today, individual and collective human stories are screaming that the control of the world is impossible but violently destroying it, pushing it toward extinction is all too possible. The world has transformed into a labyrinth of complex yet fragmented systems among which there is no compatibility, only fundamental contradictions and hypocrisies. Core idea: Power abuse hasn’t evolved, it’s just better disguised.

“The Croods” story and Actual world processes


"Moreover, humanity’s grand narratives and celebrations of 'progress' often mask regression, like colonial empires boasting civilization while erasing cultures, or modern corporations touting sustainability as they raze forests".


It is logically and practically impossible, therefore absurd to discuss time traveling, whereas time is just a human perception. But we can create stories and turn them into visual narratives (any type of movies, videos, and graphic stories like comics and graphic novels) to understand our imaginations. The man-made world consists of this great instrument, which facilitates tangible archaeological ruins and other objectively interpretable written materials to become 2D and 3D stories like The Croods.

The cartoon story "The Croods" helped me structure, with great visualization, an understanding of how the so-called primitive world and the present world’s dynamics are slowly destroying forests, valleys, mountains, oceans, and animals and by doing this, gradually leading human beings to extinction along with their territories, cultures, civilizations, and stories, leaving behind only bare space for accelerated natural transformation to prevail. This story logically demonstrates the central role of general “privation” or relative “necessity” as the creative, inventive, and progressive power behind the entire man-made world. Further, The Croods reveal humanity’s self-destructive ingenuity.

Human beings are storytellers par excellence. Without this unique quality, a "man-made world" would be impossible. Thus, we can understand that human beings first invent stories and then live them is the logical pattern that defines all of human history. Therefore, through The Croods, in their artistic creativity, we see, while standing concretely in the present, how primitive human actions, reactions, and their consequences changed and transformed the world and humanity. In brief, I argue that what we are doing is creating different logical processes with relative qualities, simply fighting for survival yet raising a clamour of black rhetoric for everything, like a hen making a big noise after laying just one egg. Moreover, humanity’s grand narratives and celebrations of 'progress' often mask regression, like colonial empires boasting civilization while erasing cultures, or modern corporations touting sustainability as they raze forests.

Shadows of Invisible Hands: The Puppeteers of Modern War


"In any case, international politics today is far stranger than in the past. I imagine invisible hands and puppets firing relentlessly, killing children and women and the great international community is celebrating their strategies with satisfaction. So, if, as I said, international politics is a puppet show, then human history itself is a story we keep rewriting one where the lines between savagery and progress blur".


hand and soldiers

The world is always being plagued by its relative conflicts and wars, just like now in 2025. But the underlying current problems aren’t much different from ancient times, and neither are the basic tactics. Some obvious yet unprovable strategies remain concerning such as the politics of convenience, the politics of bullies, the politics of buying and selling consensus, and letting others do the dirty work.

Furthermore, when convenient, some countries have previously financed and supplied weapons to so-called terrorist and criminal groups (for example The U.S. funding of Mujahideen in Afghanistan, 1980s. To counter the Soviet Union, the U.S. armed groups that later became Al-Qaeda, fuelling decades of terrorism. This proxy strategy outsourced violence while maintaining a peacekeeping façade). They tolerate and ignore war crimes, clearly because it serves their interests or as a tactic to keep a country, a nation, group or an individual under control, preventing it from becoming a future threat. In any case, international politics today is far stranger than in the past. I imagine invisible hands and puppets firing relentlessly, killing children and women and the great international community is celebrating their strategies with satisfaction. So, if, as I said, international politics is a puppet show, then human history itself is a story we keep rewriting one where the lines between savagery and progress blur.

Stop Killings and Stop Looking Backwards


"Civilization itself demands we stop enabling those who hold the world hostage to fulfil their ambitions through brutality. Gaza is the starkest example: a land stolen for a playground of the wealthy, its people erased from their own homes, dismissed as “non-land”.


It seems absurd and out of place in an age of human rights to witness killings treated as routine. Every day, people kill one another more easily, even before these human rights documents existed. As a cultured and civilized individual, I find these killings deeply disturbing and disgusting. To me, they represent barbaric acts that disregard common cultural and civil agreements.

Those who kill, who knows for what purpose or by whose authority, carry out plans hidden from the civilized world. Among all the conflicts and wars in the world, the killings in Gaza concern me most. I don’t know who has given silent or direct approval to kill children, adolescents, women, and the elderly instead of the so-called terrorists, who rarely (if ever) die in these attacks. Nobody seems to care about the killers, why? 

The shared principles of civilization demand an end to holding the world hostage for selfish gains no matter how barbaric or inhumane the methods. What’s happening in Gaza is especially alarming: we are now witnessing a luxury ‘free zone’ for the global elite, built on the forced expulsion and displacement of Palestinians from their so-called ‘non-land.

Conclusion - World dominant paranoid political traits


"The true danger today is paranoid leaders, whose actions threaten to infect entire world with their own delusions, turning shared history into a self-fulfilling prophecy of fear".

Paranoid individuals observe reality through bias and prejudice. Their convictions are more hostile than those of the average person. A paranoid "person" interprets unintentional behaviour of someone as deliberate or threatening. One can easily imagine certain national leaders operating under the same unfounded mistrust, making social cohesion and meaningful relationships impossible. Their mindset mirrors "the war of all against all." Worse, the paranoid individual is prepared to strike first consumed by the fear of being destroyed, they act swiftly to ensure survival.

Historical evidence undeniably proves the existence of "paranoid politics" in global affairs. Moreover, it is clear that such paranoia still permeates today’s political processes. Certain leaders of so-called great and powerful nations, along with allied groups of rulers and shadowy dominant forces, openly engage in the world’s most ruthless and deceitful games.

While economic manipulation may be tolerated, humanity is now witnessing something far worse: horrific, cruel, and abominable massacres of children, adolescents, women, and the elderly slaughtered; nurseries, schools, hospitals, and so-called holy sites bombed. These paranoid criminals not only commit such atrocities but also justify them, reinforcing their own delusions. Today the world is a shattered mirror. No cohesion. Only reflections of greed, fear, and the same old lies.

Finally, I affirm that while we all naturally experience a bit of paranoia and history, the truly paranoid endure a double affliction: tormented not only by the real world, like everyone else, but also by the jumbles of their own fantasies. Yet the gravest burden today lies in the fact that paranoid political leaders, through their actions, are dragging the entire world into a collective state of paranoia.




Monday, 30 June 2025

Human Violence vs. Complementary Humanism (No. 02) By Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome


This reflection probes deeply into the paradoxical nature of human violence, oscillating between unconscious drives and conscious justifications. I observe that humans, despite their cultural and ethical frameworks, often revert to a state of "unconscious-conscious contradiction," where violence is rationalized or even celebrated when convenient. This duality is starkly evident in historical and contemporary atrocities, where moral boundaries dissolve under the weight of power, ideology, and/or perceived necessity. My style of reading and narrating, by linking historical hypocrisy to modern atrocities must become a manifesto against the collective historical amnesia of all.


A Possible Definition of Human Violence


Universal and Natural Level

There is no such thing as violence or nonviolence at the universal, natural level. Everything occurs freely and spontaneously. No entity exists to judge according to conventional, habitual, or written prejudices, laws, rules, or regulations, nor to punish or reward.

Violence is Adamantly a Human Perspective

cave painting
According to my definition of man (“Man is Aventelogos,” Doctoral Thesis, 2008, Rome), humans are the catalytic foundation of violence and nonviolence, justice and injustice, good and bad. Human beings are the creators of the man-made world, where we play with rules, regulations, dichotomies of good and bad, justice and injustice, reciprocal respect, and violence and nonviolence.

What is Violence, then?

Human Violence Greek carved
Our conscious-intellectual-logical perspective contextually generates a relative existential complexity comprising rules, regulations, ethical codes, written laws, and more radical unwritten conventions - all rooted in habit-based relations, communications, and behaviours.

We have endured continuous local, regional, and global wars, as well as revolutions against various unjust causes. The harrowing experiences from these conflicts led to universal agreements to live without war, striving instead for peaceful relations and communication. Otherwise, as Thomas Hobbes noted, human beings in motion would perpetually clash, much like the spontaneous universe. The "man-made world" would then become a realm of homo homini lupus est and thus, bellum omnium contra omnes (the war of all against all).

Poster with female images

According to the UNDRR’s definition of violence, each human being must first respect themselves and others as individuals, as groups, with their psychological differences, ways of living, and distinct SPEC (Socio-Political-Economic-Cultural) systems. Humans ought to coexist without harming one another physically (no killing, infliction of harm, or injury) or psychologically.


Method

I have observed the behaviour of both individuals and conveniently agglomerated groups in their pursuit of objective targets, particularly through the use of black rhetoric and the ambiguous application and interpretation of laws, rules, and punishments. These tactics are neither new nor of my invention; they have existed since the dawn of human societies and remain deeply ingrained in behavioural patterns today.

It is fascinating, albeit disturbing, to witness their shameless effrontery as they play their dirty games in public, adorned with hollow decorum and empty honour. Thus, in this second part of the article on “Human Violence vs. Complementary Humanism,” I propose a fresh lens for interpreting select historical events, one that exposes these enduring patterns of coercion and deceit.


Historical Patterns of Violence: From Concealed Hypocrisy to Open Slaughter

I observe that history reveals the same violence, repackaged. Let us trace its mutations from the intimate to the existential. Through my historical selections, I intertwine different but logically relevant examples, each representing a distinct facet of institutionalized violence, personal hypocrisy, state-sanctioned silencing, ideological extremism, and modern warfare, constructing a cohesive argument.

King David and the Weaponization of Power

Soldiers
Even the so-called ‘divinely chosen’ are not immune to violence-as-convenience. King David, lauded as a righteous ruler, orchestrated the death of Uriah to conceal his adultery with Bathsheba, a ‘legal murder’ disguised as battlefield sacrifice. His public piety (Psalms of repentance) only underscores the hypocrisy: violence wears the mask of virtue when backed by power.

A rational reader may wonder why I cite a biblical figure to prove my argument. First, I respect this collection of historical, philosophical, and cultural books as I do other so-called sacred texts like the Bible, Quran, and Torah. The Bible was a powerful tool of colonizers, used to subdue ancient civilizations after conquest. Thus, the world’s cultural-civilizational mentality remains influenced by these texts. None can deny that global cultural hegemony is still shaped by this book, which underpins Western-U.S. thought.

Socrates and the Violence of ‘Order’

Socrates
The Athenian state, threatened by Socrates’ questions, sentenced him to death, not for crimes, but for unsettling the peace of complacency. His hemlock cup was poured by democracy itself, proof that systems punish ‘disruptors’ to preserve their own fragility. Then as now, ‘stability’ justifies silencing.



Hitler: The Human Shadow Unleashed

A boy
Hitler is not a historical anomaly but a mirror. His genocidal ideology was (and is) the repressed frustration and violent entitlement latent in collective humanity. Neo-Nazism’s global resurgence confirms this: when socio-political structures fracture, the ‘Hitler within’ is ritualized as a solution. He lives wherever identity is weaponized against the ‘other.’

Poster with human head

Ongoing Warfare: Russia, Ukraine, Gaza

Today’s wars are no less cynical. Russia invades Ukraine under pretences of ‘denazification,’ while obliterating cities. Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, framed as ‘self-defence,’ replicates the very trauma Jews endured in the Holocaust. The script never changes - elites invoke past wounds to justify new ones, while the powerless die for abstractions: borders, histories, ‘security.’

Gaza and the Inversion of Traumamen with baby dead bodies

The Holocaust remains humanity’s darkest testament to industrialized genocide a crime so monstrous that ‘Never Again’ became a universal oath. Yet in Gaza, we witness a grotesque irony: victims of historical persecution now wield overwhelming military force against a stateless population, repeating cycles of collective punishment they once endured. This is not moral equivalence but a tragic ‘exposure’ of how trauma, when weaponized by power, distorts justice into vengeance. The warning is clear: unhealed wounds, institutionalized, become future weapons.

Conclusion for Part 02

By writing this second part of the series, my aim is to strip away illusions, forcing humanity to confront its own contradictions - a rupture in collective denial where trauma, hypocrisy, or institutionalized violence can no longer be masked by rhetoric (e.g., King David’s piety, Hitler’s populism, or modern war propaganda). This study must serve as a diagnostic tool, like a surgeon cutting into flesh to reveal infection. My method dissects historical events to expose the congenital nature of human violence. The grotesque irony in Gaza is a systematic exposé (in Chinese, bàolù) of trauma’s cyclical corruption: power, even when born of suffering, replicates the structures it once resisted.

Philosophically, I use historical examples to reflect violence as a culturally human-made phenomenon, justified by laws, fear, traditions, and tribalism. One might think I provoke readers by connecting Hitler to modern extremism or Gaza to Holocaust inversion, forcing uncomfortable introspection. Yet, while respecting differing viewpoints, I affirm that humanity keeps reproducing violence, sometimes in ways that echo past horrors. The solution is not to rank atrocities but to:

1. Learn from history (how dehumanization leads to massacre),

2. Apply consistent ethical standards (condemn war crimes, whoever commits them),

3. Reject ideological demonization (whether anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, or nationalist).


If these patterns are congenital, is transcendence possible? Part 3 will explore whether Complementary Humanism can dismantle the machinery it built.