Sunday, 31 August 2025
Freedom and Freedom of Love Within SPEC Invented "Natural-Family" Scheme (part 01) By Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome
Freedom and Freedom of Love Within
Monday, 25 August 2025
An Open Letter to the 21st centuries Global Common Mind-set (LETTER 02) by Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome
An Open Letter to the 21st centuries Global Common Mind-set (LETTER 02)
Objective of letter 02: The Suicide of Sameness (uniform-flat mind-set)
The philosophy of complementary humanism as I defined it founded on differences and opposites that complete mutually: “At its core, complementarity refers to a relationship in which different elements interact in a way that enhances or completes one another, creating a functional or conceptual whole greater than the sum of its parts. This principle suggests that opposites or distinct entities can coexist in a mutually beneficial relationship rather than in conflict.” Consequently, this practical philosophy frames a uniform mentality as auto-destructive and suicidal processes. Thus, I avoid this letter being mere moralizing to a practical warning: that is to say, this, uniform and flattened world mindset isn’t simply “bad for others”; it is ultimately self-annihilating for any SPEC system or individual or group or society that practices it.
A uniform and flat mentality destroys diversity.
What does this statement convey? I, first break it down to observe how it’s so significant, examining it from individual, organizational and societal perspectives.
This mentality can be described as:
A. Uniform: Demanding conformity, sameness, and adherence to a single way of thinking, behaving, and believing. It estimates consistency over creativity.
B. Flat: Lacking depth, nuance, or hierarchy of different effective perspectives. It dismisses complexity and seeks simple, one-size-fits-all answers.
C. Enforced and shielded under quasi dogmatic-fanatic invisible authorities.
This mentality is often enforced through extremist groupthink, rigid traditions, oppressive systems, and a SPEC system that prizes assimilation above all else. This type of mentality is already being released and propagated under the name of AI systems. For example, through AI, a “uniform-flat” human mind-set is more active than through socio-politic-economic-cultural-civil (SPEC) processes (But this argument about AI, has to be discussed separately in another letter because it goes too deep).
Petty Knowledge and SPEC system dominion leads to a hackneyed boring world
Right now, the so-called scientific, technological, and other forms of intellectual knowledge are clearly under Western, U.S.A., and allies’ control, and nobody can freely come up with a new knowledge or theory. No matter the value and the functionality of a theory or knowledge, without the approval of this “visible-invisible” power, it cannot be applied or welcomed. Effectively, we are already gazing at such a smell of this flat and uniform knowledge in all academic institutions all over the world and in what we can read in so-called great books (full of cliché). They all are thinking with the same concepts, words, procedures, methods, and accorded or unchallenging outcomes that never confront or compromise the West-U.S.A. and allies’ “visible-invisible” authority.
Uniform and flat mind-set lead to auto-destruction and suicidal mind-set
I briefly jot down about this with some extremist SPEC movements that had historically reported devastating situations to the whole world, yet they are still being working for a “uniform and flat” world. Namely they are – Fascism (present day Neo-Fascist movement or Far-right movements)) and Nazism (at present: Neo-Nazism).
The drive toward a uniform and flat mentality is not just a characteristic of fascism and Nazism; it is their very foundation and primary mechanism of control.
Both ideologies are built on the violent enforcement of a single, monolithic identity and the eradication of all diversity - racial, political, ideological, cultural, psychological and intellectual.
Here’s a few points on how this tendency manifests as the core of fascist and Nazi ideology:
1. The Myth of the Homogeneous National Community (Volksgemeinschaft)
I. The Core Idea: Nazism in Germany and fascism in Italy promoted the concept of a national community based on purity and unity. For the Nazis, this was the Volksgemeinschaft (people's community), which was defined by a shared "blood" or race (Aryan/Nordic).
II. Eradication of Diversity: This community was, by definition, exclusive. It required the identification and elimination of those deemed "outsiders" or "enemies of the state" who were blamed for the nation's problems. This included Jews, Roma and Sinti (Gypsies), Slavs, Black people, LGBTQ+ individuals, people with disabilities, and political and intellectual dissidents.
III. The "Flat" Mentality: The complexity of a modern, diverse society was rejected in favour of a simplistic, mythical past of racial purity and national glory. Anyone who complicated this narrative was a threat.
2. The Rejection of Pluralism and Debate
I. "One People, One Empire, One Leader" (Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer): This Nazi slogan perfectly encapsulates the rejection of diversity. Pluralism, the idea that multiple groups, parties, and ideas can coexist and compete peacefully - is the antagonist of fascism.
II. Suppression of Opposition: All rival political parties, trade unions, and independent media were abolished. There was to be no debate, no dissent, and no alternative sources of power or information. The state's ideology was the only permitted truth.
3. The Cult of Tradition and Anti-Intellectualism
I. Rejection of "Decadent" Modern Art: The Nazis infamously condemned modern, abstract, and avant-garde art as "degenerate" (Entartete Kunst). They favoured a flat, simplistic, and heroic artistic style that served state propaganda.
II. Attack on Intellectuals: Free-thinking intellectuals, scientists, and philosophers who challenged the regime's simplistic worldview were persecuted, fired from universities, and forced into exile or worse. Ideas were only valued if they served the state's ideology.
4. The Scapegoating of the "Other"
I. Creating a Unified "Us" vs. a Demonized "Them": This is perhaps the most critical tool. A uniform mentality cannot be created solely through positive reinforcement of unity. It requires a common enemy to define itself against. The present world is unanimously accorded with treating “immigrants” as the common enemy. As the world is convinced, the most civilized and rich countries of Europe, U.S.A. and their allies are explicitly following this idea: immigrant is an enemy and a threat to be eliminated. They have instrumentalized strategically human rights, democracy, sovereign state and defence of territories from enemies.
II. Diversity as a Threat: Nazis portrayed diversity itself as a Jewish-Bolshevik plot to weaken the nation. The existence of different ethnicities, political beliefs, and sexual orientations was framed not as a natural state of society but as a deliberate attack on the "health" of the Volk. The "final solution"—the Holocaust—was the ultimate, horrific expression of the desire to eliminate this diversity and create a "pure," uniform society.
I would explicitly ask those Jews in Israel today who are deliberately targeting innocent children, youth, adults, and the elderly and bombing schools, nurseries, and hospitals in Gaza – are you conscious of your history and your present lifestyle? Are you thinking of an ideologically perfect state where there are no enemies and differences, but everything is homogeneous, as Hitler believed and tried to establish? I have added these two questions because even today, 25 August 2025, the Israeli army targeted a hospital and killed innocents and journalists in Gaza. It is absurd!
Conclusion
This is the great paradox of your pursuit of safety through sameness: it is the most dangerous gamble you can make. You are sacrificing your freedom of being in the world as an authentic individual, your creativity, your resilience, your adaptability, and your understood very humanity, on the bench of a comfortable, yet false, consensus.
The alternative is not chaos or SPEC anarchism. It is intelligent pluralism. It is a society that understands strength is derived from a symphony of differences, not a monotonous drone. It is the courage to be challenged, the humility to learn from conflict, and the wisdom to build systems that protect the right to be different, not the mandate to be the same.
So, if can wisely and freely, Stop the suicide. Embrace the friction. Seek out the dissonant voice, the unfamiliar idea, the person and perspective that does not fit. For it is only in that diversity - of thought, of identity, of experience - that any true and lasting security can ever be found.
Friday, 22 August 2025
An Open Letter to the 21st centuries Global Common Mind-set (LETTER 01) by Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome
An Open Letter to the 21st centuries Global Common Mind-Set (LETTER 01)
Why this letter
I’m writing this letter in favour of my world vision based on philosophy of complementary humanism. But this is not merely a philosophical reflection but a sort of manifesto with a dense, articulate, and unflinching diagnosis of the central pathology of our time. I know my style is academic yet visceral, philosophical yet urgent, which is precisely what a topic of this gravity demands. I avoid cliché and invite the reader to confront uncomfortable realities.
Fear of difference and world SPEC systems
The world is what each individual sees what he/she wants and desire to see. But the present dynamic (dynamic means move, change, transform, decay and continue in “now” wiggling processes) world that one observes is not something so called “pure” or an “exclusively individual creation”, imagination or construction. It is rather deliberately and systematically manipulated by invented stories, ethical and moral fables and systematic Socio-political-economic-cultural-civil (SPEC) indoctrinations. Consequently, such a manipulated mind-set can never project a genuine world, but only the kind we observe even 21st century: one plagued by the same bloody new forms of imperialism enforced by conveniently activated unscrupulous religionism, racism, nationalism, neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, terrorism and criminal organization dominations. This is a world of killings, an accelerated common mind fearing difference and the carrying out of world- flattening mind-set programmes against natural diversities. In brief, any world “common mind-set” is not organic, but a deliberately engineered product designed to create a “flat world” easy to dominate and control.
The target on child-hood indoctrination
One of the most preoccupying, contorted, prejudice based, and violent and intolerant minded activities strategically embedded within an old-fashioned world vision is that of common human cultural mind-set. In almost all socio-political-economic-cultural (SPEC) systems state education systems and religious institutions strategically target common children. They are indoctrinated from childhood to hate, refuse and destroy difference. They forcefully formed to think, decide and act for a uniform-world, a flat world that is easy to dominate and control. We are almost there in 2025.
Targeted Definitions of Differences
Differences are defined as problems, anomalies and pathologies to be cured, keep under control or - if the relative SPEC system is challenged by them - to be destroyed by using “instrumentalized human rights” and “democracy”. They are just tolerated when there is no other choice for reasons such as their lack of a majority or relative powerlessness.
An Open Invitation for All
I am not writing this against none. I simply observe how the world is processing within critical parameters. My aim is to invite anybody to reflect on these facts from a 21st century critical point of view. The humanity we have modelled over thousands of years must be changed for its better function and survival. We are willy-nilly assisting un-necessary conflicts, wars and killings all over the world due to our close-mindedness, self-hatred and emotional disturbances projected onto differences - particularly those of gender, race, religion, group, skin colour, political views, different ideas and region. Thus, I wrote this brief open letter to all human beings.
Thursday, 21 August 2025
WATER - MAN THE NARRATOR 10 - Autobiographical-philosophical digital web comic page 09 - by Ajith Rohan J.T.F.
I was able to forge Eastern practical philosophy,
Western thought, and my own personal experience into a model for my pragmatic
philosophy of complementary humanism. No one can say that nothing is real. What
is most real, socially and culturally, is this fluid, evolving story. Thus, I
“see” only the beauty of perpetual wiggling nature (moving, becoming, decaying, transforming). It is a powerful reminder that a
life well-lived seeds the future with endless, beautiful stories and, in doing
so, transcends its own biological and biographical limits.
Wednesday, 13 August 2025
“Your death is my life” based 21st Century Humanity - Ajith Rohan J.T.F., Rome
This is the approximate bloody image of our world: “Mors tua, vita mea” - the Latin phrase translates to “your death, my life” or “your death is my life.” I prefer to use the second translation in this article: “Your death is my life.”
PREMISE
When the world is a den of SPEC (socio-political-economic-cultural) killers, criminals, terrorists, and thieves, all cling to the principle: “your death is my life.”
Human History Is Portrayed by Killings, Conflicts, and Wars
Yet, a mentality rooted in historical guilt biases Western and U.S. policymakers toward this “quasi-alien” people. How much longer must the world endure Israel’s gratuitous violence against innocents? They kill and justify atrocities by labelling victims as “terrorists” or “antisemitic.” What about the children, women, and elderly? Are they all “terrorists” and “antisemitic”?
“Guilty Conscience Troubles the Mind” – Western and U.S.A. Politics
Is the silence regarding Israeli killings due to a “guilty conscience” over World War II? As an Asian-origin academic living in Europe (Rome), I still find this strange, as I have no concept of so-called “antisemitism.” I suspect this term, beyond its original meaning, has been instrumentalized to advance certain strategies. It resembles children exploiting their parents’ guilt to get what they want. For instance, Germany provides war logistics to this “special group” (who claim to be “chosen by their God”) to kill Hamas members in Gaza. Yet, we clearly see that no terrorists, but children, adolescents, women, the elderly, and journalists are being slaughtered daily with these weapons.
Historical guilt over past “errors” does not justify arming killers and staying silent as they massacre innocents. The Western world is undoubtedly a great and attractive place to live and collaborate, with advanced academic, scientific, technological, and theoretically human rights-based democratic systems. Its SPEC (socio-political-economic-cultural) systems function better than most. Yet, a mentality rooted in historical guilt biases Western and U.S. policymakers toward this “quasi-alien” people. How much longer must the world endure Israel’s gratuitous violence against innocents? They kill and justify atrocities by labelling victims as “terrorists” or “antisemitic.” What about the children, women, and elderly? Are they all “terrorists” and “antisemitic”?
The concept of “antisemitism” remains strange and quasi-unidentified to me. For example, Asian people are unfamiliar with this instrumentalized, clamoured-about concept, defined as “prejudice against” or “hatred of Jews” (or far-right quasi-fascist Zionists?)
Instrumentalized – “Antisemitism” and “Russophobia”
I have no personal interest in or relations with this group, which the West and U.S.A. fanatically and dogmatically protect. But for me, the killing of children, youth, women, and the elderly - and the bombing of schools, nurseries, and hospitals - is intolerable. What this “special people” demand is simple: global recognition as a nation. Though their tricky manoeuvring to gain Western, U.S., and U.N. approval as a country can be tolerated, their actions in Gaza defy their claimed principles.
The world, as I said, is changing. Old systems are fading, losing their spirit due to incoherent and immature mindsets.
International community is dragging the world into an “unknown crisis”?
We do not approve of Hamas’ killings. But “we don’t bite a dog that has bitten us.” We must act wisely and diligently. When Israel follows the same ruthless methods as Hamas, what is the difference? No one can accept Gaza’s killings just because Hamas killed people two years ago. The world, as I said, is changing. Old systems are fading, losing their spirit due to incoherent and immature mindsets.
Russophobia
continue to no II